Cases 1 - 10 of 11
US v. Larry Speed
as 21-6570
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Wilson v. California Medical Facility, et al
as 21-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
HANK BLANK, Correctional Plant Supervisor, R. W. FOX, MICHAEL C. SMITH, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
GODFREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04266
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RICHARD GODFREY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Larry Speed
as 20-6753
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GODFREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26892
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GODFREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattingly v. Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00460
Defendant:
Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. , Robert Remington , Richard Godfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Mattingly, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. California Medical Facility et al
as 2:2016cv01547
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California Medical Facility, Michael C. Smith, Jacob Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
US v. Larry Speed
as 14-6494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed
Godfrey v. Building Materials Corporation of America
as 8:2012cv00341
Plaintiff:
Richard Godfrey
Defendant:
Building Materials Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
