Cases 1 - 10 of 396
Williams et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 5:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Williams and Richard Williams
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Addison et al v. Huye et al
as 2:2024cv00947
Defendant:
Oakwood Bank, Equal Access Justice Fund L P, Richard William Huye, III and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Addison, Accord Services and Adriana L. Addison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Webb v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Webb
Defendant:
Lopez, Unknown Harpe, Richard Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cerilli v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01163
Defendant:
Dab Cruz, Richard Williams, Taksha West and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roake et al v. Brumley et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Darcy Roake, Adrian Van Young, Mamie Broadhurst and others
Defendant:
Cade Brumley, Conrad Appel, Judy Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00231
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
