Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sutton v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Rick Sutton and Rick M Sutton
Defendant:
Jack Adams and Maison Royale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 a Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Sutton v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
Rick Sutton, Rjano Holdings, Inc., Maison Royale, LLC and others
Defendant:
Jack Adams and RJANO Holding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 a Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SUTTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10338
Plaintiff:
RICK SUTTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUTTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02937
Plaintiff:
RICK SUTTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUTTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
RICK SUTTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUTTON v. DENISON PARKING, INC.
as 1:2016cv03264
Defendant:
DENISON PARKING, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICK SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hines v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
Montorio C Hines
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, S A Godinez, Rick Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genova v. Banner Health, et al
as 12-1314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RON GENOVA, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
BANNER HEALTH and RICK SUTTON
Genova v. Banner Health et al
as 1:2011cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ron Genova
Defendant:
Banner Health , North Colorado Medical Center , Rick (I) Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
