Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hayden v. Kordick et al
as 1:2022cv06957
Defendant:
Kariejean Kordick, Karie Kordick, K.J. Kordick and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Martin v. Gwinnett County Jail
as 1:2021cv04499
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joseph Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky FritchmanIn re: Ricky Fritchman
as 20-2330
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: RICKY JOSEPH FRITCHMAN
TUKUFU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JOSEPH TUKUFU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trahan v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01782
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joseph Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Vellmer v. St. Louis County Department of Justice Services et al
as 4:2017cv01451
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joseph Vellmer
Defendant:
St. Louis County Department of Justice Services and Herbert Bernsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Johnson v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme
as 16-13641
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY JOSEPH JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Alex v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv03261
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joseph Alex
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alex v. Stephens
as 1:2015cv00991
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joseph Alex
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
