Cases 1 - 10 of 709
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Antrobus v. OBCC Warden
as 24-1054
Petitioner:
ANDRE ANTROBUS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF OBCC RIKERS ISLAND
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Antrobus v. Warden of OBCC Rikers Island
as 24-920
Petitioner:
ANDRE ANTROBUS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF OBCC RIKERS ISLAND
Nazer v. Manhattan District Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02713
Petitioner:
Izzat Nazer
Respondent:
Manhattan District Attorney and Warden at Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledesma v. Rikers Island Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Elias Ledesma
Defendant:
Rikers Island Dept of Corrections, Deputy Warden Mr. Brathwaite and Warden Ronald Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Eric Golden
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Green, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Aimes et al
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn Brewster
Defendant:
Mataka Aimes, C.O. Yancy, Captain G and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Rikers Island G.R.V.C.
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jerome Noble
Defendant:
Rikers Island G.R.V.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Riker Island et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ruiz
Defendant:
Riker Island, Downstate, Midstate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
