Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Elsila v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2026cv02019
Respondent:
Alison Ritter, Randy L Roesler and State of Wisconsin
Petitioner:
Martha R Elsila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Cozzens v. Washington County et al
as 4:2026cv00122
Defendant:
Nathan A. Brooksby, Washington County, David Grygla and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Floyd Cozzens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Powell et al
as 3:2026cv01703
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Jerome Powell, Elissa Leonard, Kentanji Brown and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
RITTER SR v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 4:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RITTER, SR
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
RITTER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01959
Plaintiff:
BILL RITTER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RITTER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02027
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RITTER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Nana Baidoobonso-I AM v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv10106
Plaintiff:
Nana Baidoobonso-I AM
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Kellmark Tow Services, Ritter Lien Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okopu v. Tumwater City of et al
as 3:2026cv06022
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Okopu
Defendant:
Tumwater City of and Hannah Ritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
