Cases 1 - 10 of 1,193
Ritter v. Hunt et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Amanda Womack, Danial Woydick, Melissa Scharf and others
Plaintiff:
Winston A. Ritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hussaini et al v. Ritter
as 1:2024cv13215
Plaintiff:
Kyle Magnuson, Joshua Fourdyce, Gabriela Gomez and others
Defendant:
Andy Ritter
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Hussaini et al v. Fourdyce et al
as 1:2024cv13216
Plaintiff:
Ghousunnisa Hussaini, Bilal Hussaini and Gabriela Gomez
Defendant:
Joshua Fourdyce, Kyle Magnuson, Andy Ritter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hussaini et al v. Fourdyce et al
as 1:2024cv13217
Defendant:
Andy Ritter, Moretti, Bryan Maculitis and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Gomez, Ghousunnisa Hussaini and Bilal Hussaini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company v. Rihel et al
as 1:2024cv03553
Defendant:
Nicholas Ritter and Robert Rihel
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
King v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv01630
Respondent:
Thomas Hasle, Allison Ritter, Sao Yang and others
Petitioner:
Kimberly E King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RITTER et al v. JOHNSON
as 1:2024mc00156
Petitioner:
DIANE F. RITTER and DAVID M. RITTER
Respondent:
JERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01966
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ritter v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv06326
Plaintiff:
Tabresha Ritter
Defendant:
Jamar Lamont Williams and Vistar Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
US v. Daqua Ritter
as 24-4576
Defendant:
DAQUA LAMEEK RITTER, a/k/a Quavo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
