Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Roark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROARK
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
In re: Sisneros
as 26-1287
Petitioner:
JEROME SISNEROS
Respondent:
DEAN WILLIAMS, JERRY ROARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Roark v. USA
as 3:2026cv02363
Petitioner:
Lance Douglas Roark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Roark v. 15th Judicial District of Tennessee Child Support Enforcement Agency et al
as 3:2026cv00895
Plaintiff:
Peyton Roark
Defendant:
15th Judicial District of Tennessee Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Tennessee, Department of Human Services, Karen Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axos Clearing LLC v. Acquarulo et al
as 1:2026cv04796
Petitioner:
Axos Clearing LLC
Respondent:
Joseph Acquarulo, Arnold B. Anderson, Michael Backus and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 12 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Owens v. Hilliard et al
as 3:2026cv01712
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Renee Owens
Defendant:
Officer Brianna Hilliard, Officer Matthew Price, Officer Russell Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
