Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,690
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff: Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff: Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant: Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff: Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant: M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Morrison v. County of Yellowstone et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: James Morrison
Defendant: County of Yellowstone, Terry Halpin, Emily Jo Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant: BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roark v. Richardson Bay Regional Agency, et al.
as 24-1863
Plaintiff: ROBERT JAMES ROARK
Defendant: RICHARDSON BAY REGIONAL AGENCY, STEVEN MCGRATH and JAMES MALCOLM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02268
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roark v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00936
ROARK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02619
Plaintiff: VICTORIA ROARK
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff: RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant: MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?