Cases 41 - 50 of 112
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WHELAN et al
as 2:2015cv08542
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANNETTE L. WHELAN, KATHLEEN BROOKS, ROBERT BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Harrington et al v. City of Hastings et al
as 4:2015cv03152
Defendant:
John Adams, All Other Employees of the City of Hastings, Josh Armon and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and Midwest Girls Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Griffith-Guerrero v Spokane County et al
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Conner Griffith-Guerrero
Defendant:
Spokane County , Robert Brooke and Evan Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROOKS v. GNC HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2015cv01424
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROOKS
Defendant:
GNC HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Brooks, Jr. v. USA
as 15-3323
Petitioner:
ROBERT BROOKS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sjothun v. Banner Gateway Medical Center et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant:
Banner Gateway Medical Center, AZ/DCYF/CPS , Jeni Bilski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv09991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sjothun-Franklin et al v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2014cv02600
Plaintiff:
Joli Sjothun-Franklin and Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security , Clarence Carter , Gilbert Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MCKENNA et al v. TOLL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06543
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCKENNA and MICHELLE MCKENNA
Defendant:
TOLL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. , TOLL BROS., INC. , ROBERT BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
