Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Carpenter v. SAIC MedPlus Health Insurance Plan
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Robert Carpenter
Defendant:
SAIC MedPlus Health Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Darron Campbell v. City of Tucson, et al
as 09-15736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRON KEITH CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, CHIEF OF POLICE, Tucson Police Department, TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
GLOVER v. ROBERT CARPENTER, CPA et al
as 2:2009cv01328
Plaintiff:
DENNIS W. GLOVER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARPENTER, CPA, GRAMKOW CARNEVALE SEIFERT & CO., LLC, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Carpenter v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
Robert Carpenter
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and Paul J. Hooten & Associates
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Carpenter v. Republic of Chile et al
as 2:2007cv05290
Plaintiff:
Robert Carpenter
Defendant:
Republic of Chile, Minister of Justice, Judge Blanca Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Darron Keith Campbell
Defendant:
City of Tucson, Chief of Police, Tucson Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABNER et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66364
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO ABNER, CLAUDIA ABNER, VICTORIA M. ADAMS and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
