Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Earl Anderson v. John Hairabedian, et al
as 20-4177
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BRANDEL, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Corrections Counselor-ToCI, MARSHAL KLAVINGER, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Correctional Counselor, ROBERT COPELY, individually and in his/her official capacity as Lieutenant Supervisor-ToCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Cope v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv07320
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cope v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv01802
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cope v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Hairabedian et al
as 3:2019cv02297
Plaintiff:
Earl Anderson
Defendant:
Derek Burkhart, Captain Supervisor Ronald Pettaway, Correctional Officer LaDonna Shorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02922
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cope v. SYNCHRONY BANK, N.A.
as 0:2016cv61801
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cope v. Reedy P. et al
as 3:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Defendant:
Reedy P., Geisinger, Kosikoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Copes v. Maynard et al
as 8:2012cv03242
Plaintiff:
Robert Copes
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
