Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Guritz #680608 v. Corrigan
as 2:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Robert Edward-Owen Guritz #680608
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Stevenson, Jr
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Potter v. St. Charles County, et al
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Sneed v. Airmark et al
as 0:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Airmark, Department of Corrections, Little Sandy Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sneed v. Commonwealth of KY Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv00025
Defendant:
Robert Edward Sneed and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEC Financial Services, LLC v. Victoria Edward Spa & Wellness, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01407
Defendant:
Robert Brassfield, Sharifa Brassfield, Victoria Edward Spa & Wellness, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NEC Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 0:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex, Segregation at Little Sandy Correctional Complex and The Warden at Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
