Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
EDWARDS et al v. FLAGSHIP RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al
as 1:2022cv05386
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EDWARDS and KIMBERLY BARLOW
Defendant:
FLAGSHIP RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., ATLANTIC PALACE DEVELOPMENT LLC, EQUIANT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Edwards v. Koller et al
as 2:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mike Chisman and Dane Koller
Plaintiff:
Robert Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
as 1:2020cv01389
Plaintiff:
Reverend Robert Edwards
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Hamrick v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2020cv00486
Defendant:
John Pollard, Laura Ballentine, Clayton Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Don Hamrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Starr et al
as 1:2020cv00489
Defendant:
Eric Starr, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and Latonya Chames
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kubiak v. County of Ravalli et al
as 9:2020cv00036
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Deputy Daryl Petz, County of Ravalli and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Kubiak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manns v. Dulin et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Manns
Defendant:
William Dulin, Robert Olejniczak, North Judson Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
