Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Zivkovic v. Hood, et al
as 17-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ZIVKOVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY HOOD and ROBERT JOHNSON
Zivkovic v. Hood et al
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
David Zivkovic
Defendant:
Kimberly Hood and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 3:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Himchak, III v. Daniel Dye, et al
as 16-3654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III, Navy Veteran
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL DYE, Deputy Atty. General, Comn of PA - Office Atty. General, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN, LT. Current Station CMDR - FMR. Internal Affairs Dept. and others
Slater v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01811
Defendant:
City of Medford and Robert Johnson
Plaintiff:
John Columbus Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.G. et al v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2016cv02290
Plaintiff:
A.G. and M.G.
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Consuelo Soto, Catherine Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Williams et al
as 6:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
William Harrison, Jr. and Jeannette Harrison Murby
Defendant:
Jackie Williams, Kim Johnson, Dustin Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Femster v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2016cv12458
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Femster
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Gregory Robson and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Optimum Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11000
Plaintiff:
Joann J Jones
Defendant:
Optimum Labs, Inc. and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teixeira v. Optimum Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11003
Plaintiff:
Juanita Teixeira
Defendant:
Optimum Labs, Inc. and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
