Cases 11 - 20 of 149
James Scott v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99000
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Acton et al v. Adel et al
as 2:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Keisha Action, Nathan Aderholdt, Britney Austin and others
Defendant:
Allister Adel, Tom Van Dorne, Ken Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Caballos-Galendo et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Idaho State Corrections Center, Ramond Caballos-Galendo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2021cv00485
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Jake D Busby and Jonathan D Tynes
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. State Of Louisiana et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Defendant:
State Of Louisiana, Jonathan D. Tynes and Jake D Busby
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Caballos-Galendo et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Idaho State Corrections Center, Sergeant Host and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv03497
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingram v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2019cv02025
Respondent:
State of Washington and King County Superior Court
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ingram v. Keyes et al
as 4:2019cv05273
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections and James Keyes
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. King County Superior Court et al
as 2:2019cv01981
Respondent:
State of Washington, King County Superior Court and Donald R Holbrook
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
