Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Crawley et al v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Daine Crawley, Mitch Ficken, Lamar Hearon and others
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Robert Suwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collette v. Robinson et al
as 5:2022cv05216
Plaintiff:
David Paul Rivera Collette
Defendant:
Lieutenant Derek Stamps, Nurse Tracey Robison, Corporal Joseph Gulley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Elkins v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jessie Elkins
Defendant:
Corporal f/n/u Corbin and Brandon Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elkins v. Corbin
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jessie Elkins
Defendant:
Cpl Corbin and Brandon Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elkins v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jessie Elkins
Defendant:
Corporal f/n/u Corbin and Brandon Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tuxhorn et al
as 5:2022cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
E. Tuxhorn, D. Robison, Leu Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
