Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
William McDuffey et all v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02491
Defendant: Warren Pumps, LLC, ITT, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff: William McDuffey and Teri McDuffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff: Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant: Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner: Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Behrmann v. ABB Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05685
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA Inc, Keenan Properties Inc, Meriden Molded Plastics Inc and others
Plaintiff: Behrmann H Ronald, Aldrich Pump LLC and Ronald H Behrmann
Not Classified By Court: Lockheed Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Elorreaga et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05696
Defendant: ABB, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Roberto Elorreaga and Rosemary Elorreaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Speck v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant: VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff: John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sibley v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07697
Plaintiff: Christopher George Sibley and Maria Sibley
Defendant: Blackmer Pump Company, EATON CORPORATION individually and sii to Vickers Pump;, VIKING PUMP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?