Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02233
Petitioner:
Roderick Miles Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv00673
Petitioner:
Roderick A. Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lateef v. Medical Department et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem A Lateef, Jr, Kareem Ali Lateef, Jr and Roderick Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Medical Department, Safe Prisons Department, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Davis
as 21-30708
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Roderick A. Davis
DAVIS v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 5:2019cv00277
Plaintiff:
RODERICK DALE DAVIS
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01634
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dale Davis
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Dunsworth v. Holder et al
as 2:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dunsworth
Defendant:
Kenneth L Holder, James Dycus, Roderick D Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Davis et al
as 2:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bush
Defendant:
Roderick D Davis, Rory L Griffin, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
