Cases 1 - 10 of 18
White v. Nunag et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Roderick White
Defendant:
Nunag and Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hooper et al
as 3:2022cv00385
Petitioner:
Roderick White
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy Batsell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv05528
Plaintiff:
Tracy Batsell, Daniel Brown, Timothy Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Batsell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 0:2021cv01458
Plaintiff:
Tracy Batsell, Diane Nichols, Devyn Cote and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Batsell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as MN/0:21-CV-01458
Plaintiff:
Batsell, Tracy Batsell, Daniel Brown and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47455
Plaintiff:
RODERICK WHITE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bure v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80752
Plaintiff:
John Bure
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, S. Cosgrove, KoHill-Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Heinly v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80708
Plaintiff:
Matthew Heinly
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw and Roderick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2013cv80707
Plaintiff:
Patrick Carter
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw and Roderick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.