Cases 1 - 10 of 25
GREEN v. AVILES
as 2:2022cv07430
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GREEN v. INSPIRA HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2022cv05718
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
INSPIRA HOSPITAL and SHANNON HARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv14144
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, RN EVELYN OLSON and LPN DELORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Green, Sr. v. Mercy Housing, Inc., et al
as 20-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA XXXVIII, a California limited partnership, MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and MERCY HOUSING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY GREEN, Sr.
Rodney Green, Sr. v. Mercy Housing, Inc., et al
as 20-15134
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA XXXVIII, a California limited partnership, MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. and MERCY HOUSING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY GREEN, Sr.
GREENE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03340
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2019cv00211
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
GREEN v. ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00863
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
