Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Mosley v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Cpt. Strickland , Mrs. Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Rodney Wilson
as 13-6223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY WILSON
Livingston v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Livingston
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Sgt. Williams, Rodney Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Metcalf
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Tobias Thomas and Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McGhee
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Tobias Thomas and Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hyperion Towers Homeowners Association Inc et al
as 4:2012cv01741
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hyperion Towers Homeowners Association Inc, Hyperion Towers Homeowners Association Board of Directors, Jim Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wilson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wilson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
US v. Rodney Wilson
as 10-6530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY WILSON
United States of America v. Wilson
as 1:2010cv01247
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
US v. Rodney Wilson
as 09-7892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
