Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Keidy Cruz-Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1212
Petitioner:
KEIDY YESENIA CRUZ-ROMERO, E.J.E.C. and H.J.E.C.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Sulma De Jesus Guandique-De Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
SULMA DE JESUS GUANDIQUE-DE ROMERO, W.A.R.G. and Z.M.R.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Tillman v. Tillman et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Marialina T. Tillman
Defendant:
Bryant T. Tillman, Chelsa Hehl, Allyson Valdivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gonzalez v. Bodiford et al
as 2:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Uriel Romero Gonzalez
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford, Mr. Hollister and Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAR Contractors, Inc. v. Romero
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
GAR Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Alberto Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Adam et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam, Lisa Butz, Chane Canfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gonzalez v. Gilpin et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Arce Gonzalez
Defendant:
CDO Gilpin, Sgt. Sires, Romero Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
