Cases 11 - 20 of 363
GAR Contractors, Inc. v. Romero
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
GAR Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Alberto Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Adam et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam, Lisa Butz, Chane Canfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gonzalez v. Gilpin et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Arce Gonzalez
Defendant:
CDO Gilpin, Sgt. Sires, Romero Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Selvin v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Romero Leon Selvin
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean, Yes Care, Inc., Nicole Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Commander et al
as 4:2023cv06708
Plaintiff:
Reynerio R. Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas W. Commander, Sr. and Thomas D. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elvin Romero-Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2090
Petitioner:
ELVIN OMAR ROMERO-LOPEZ and ANGELA JOHANY ROMERO-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Archibald-Romero v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Taylor Archibald-Romero
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Francisco Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1915
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
