Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Houcks et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
Michelle Houcks, Saundra Newsom, Niko Quinn and others
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas, Thomas (nmi) Dailey, James Swafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Crumrine v. Trekker Distributor, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv22436
Plaintiff:
Thomas Crumrine
Defendant:
Trekker Distributor, Inc., Trekker Tractor, LLC, Jose J Cestero Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Miller v. Eddy
as 3:2023cv50200
Petitioner:
Ronald A Miller
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Miller v. El Dorado County Jail
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Miller
Defendant:
El Dorado County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Miller
as 23-10279
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Lee Miller
Miller v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 6:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company and Cheryl R. Wynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Miller v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Miller
Respondent:
Unknown Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Miller
as 22-6109
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE MILLER, SR.
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
