Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barnett et al v. International Hospitality Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barnett, Jill Cooper, Barnett Cooper Conjugal Society and others
Defendant:
International Hospitality Services, Inc., International Hospitality Enterprises, Inc. and Chubb Insurance Company of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Bonham v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Bonham
Defendant:
Ronald Barnett, Mike Gleason and Ghulam Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02501
Plaintiff:
Clarence Ronald Barnett
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28617
Plaintiff:
Clarence Ronald Barnett
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Barnett v. Wilson
as 5:2007cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barnett
Defendant:
Thomas H. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Bittick
as 5:2007cv00324
Petitioner:
Ronald Barnett
Respondent:
John Cary Bittick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
