Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bradley v. Newrez LLC
as 1:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRADLEY
Defendant:
Newrez LLC D/B/A Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bradley et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tara Bradley and Ronald Bradley
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Barbara Gibson et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03173
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gibson , Lee Cain , Edith T. Javius and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barbara Gibson et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:02-16-06592
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gibson , Lee Cain , Edith T. Javius and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Barbara Gibson et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06592
Plaintiff:
Virginia Almeida, Donald Bergeron, Gayle Bergeron and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Bradley v. Elite Property Management
as 4:2015cv14468
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bradley
Defendant:
Elite Property Management
Bradley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11271
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bradley and Ronald Bradley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2526
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00660
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Bradley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bradley
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Desposito and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
