Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WARCHESUNSAPE et al v. HILL WALLACK LLP et al
as 2:2026cv11609
Plaintiff:
DONELL BRANCH WARCHESUNSAPE and BB REALESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
HILL WALLACK LLP, THE CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICE OF THE ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reeves v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2026cv04057
Plaintiff:
Roney Charles Reeves
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Roney v. Walgreen Co et al
as 3:2026cv02276
Plaintiff:
Christeane Burns Roney
Defendant:
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy LLC, ABC Company and Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hollander v. Brown et al
as 1:2026cv00113
Plaintiff:
Brady Hollander
Defendant:
Todd Brown, Keith Foster, Samuel Roney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1799
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHRUSTOWSKI, BS. v. BUMB et al
as 3:2026cv02415
Plaintiff:
RENEE A. CHRUSTOWSKI, BS.
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE RENEE MARIE BUMB, ART RONEY, JOHN EASTLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
