Cases 1 - 10 of 15
US v. Carlton Hughes
as 22-6747
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLTON ROY HUGHES, a/k/a Coogi
Maikijah HaKeem, et al v. Chad Mesojedec, et al
as 21-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maikijah HaKeem, Jacquard Larkiin, Roy Hughes and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth "Liz" A. Wyatt, Security Counselor, Nick Lammi, Rehabilitation Counselor, Peter Puffer, Clinical Director MSOP-Moose Lake and others
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60045
Plaintiff:
ROY HUGHES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. USA
as 5:2020cv00106
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlton Roy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Carlton Hughes
as 19-4638
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLTON ROY HUGHES, a/k/a Coogi
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ealy v. Hughes
as 2:2019cv02443
Plaintiff:
Tomeisha Ealy
Defendant:
Roy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daywitt et al v. Volunteer Services Department et al
as 0:2019cv01632
Defendant:
Nick Lammi, Chad Mesojedec, Volunteer Services Department and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Hughes and Kenneth Daywitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ha'Keem et al v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Maikijah Ha'Keem, Roy Hughes, James Booker and others
Defendant:
Chad Mesojedec , Troy Basaraba , Elizabeth Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Skinner, et al v. John Bordages, Jr., et al
as 15-60579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE M. SKINNER and MANUEL E. SKINNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BORDAGES, JR., Individually, CRAIG SHOWS, Individually, JOHN HAWKINS, Individually and others
Jesse Skinner v. John Bordages, Jr.
as 15-60579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse M. Skinner and Manuel E. Skinner, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Bordages, Jr., Individually, Craig Shows, Individually, John Hawkins, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
