Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Oliver v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Roy Oliver
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Edwards v. Oliver
as 21-10366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Odell Edwards, Individually and as the Father of Jordan Edwards and on behalf of Minors VA and KE and as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Edwards Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
Roy Oliver
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rhonda Washington, Individually, and as Next Friend for M.E. and M.E., minors and Shaunkeyia Keyon Stephens
Oliver v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2019cv01765
Respondent:
State of Texas, DA Snipes, Lee S Meritt and others
Interested Party:
Sheryll Beatty and Sheryl Beatty
Petitioner:
Roy Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Oliver et al
as 3:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
Odell Edwards
Defendant:
Roy Oliver and The City of Balch Springs Texas
Movant:
Shaunkeyia Keyon Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. USA
as 4:2014cv00095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roy Oliver Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Cochran
as 1:2012cv00479
Petitioner:
Calvin Alphonse Lee
Respondent:
Sam Cochran and Roy Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANDERS et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61610
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER SANDERS and OPAL SANDERS
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
