Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gardner v. Town of Mooresville et al
as 5:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Cindy Michelle Gardner
Defendant:
Town of Mooresville and Russell Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell-Clarke v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2021cv04131
Plaintiff:
Gillian Russell-Clarke
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mooney v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Dimple Mooney
Defendant:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company , Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. , Tony Russell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. Clark et al
as 0:2013cv02917
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Henderson
Defendant:
Russell Clark, Jerry Newburger and City of Blaine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Bromwell, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 13-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger Dale Merchant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director MO Dept of Corrections and Jeremiah Nixon, Governor
Bromwell et al v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger D Merchant and others
Defendant:
George Lombardi and Jeremiah Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. THE ORIGINAL LOG CABIN HOMES LTD et al
as 3:2011cv05669
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL CLARK
Defendant:
THE ORIGINAL LOG CABIN HOMES LTD, C & S LOG HOMES, INC., CURTIS J. PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00359
Plaintiff:
James Russell Clark
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murphy v. Goff et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Carolyn Baker, Deborah Berkley, Bridges Treatment Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
