Cases 1 - 10 of 2,694
Sullivan v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
Steve Sullivan, Herbert McCowen, Diana Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KHAYRALLAH v. RUTHERFORD
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
KOVO KHAYRALLAH
Defendant:
JOHN H RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Hovis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Oreon Tyshon Hovis
Defendant:
Wayne Wilson, FNU Moore, County of Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65459
Plaintiff:
Nick C Rutherford
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Linthieum et al
as 4:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Scott Rutherford
Defendant:
Lannette Linthieum, Owen Murray, Philip Keiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
