Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Riley-El et al v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv08656
Plaintiff:
William Riley-El and Ronald Schaefer
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Salvador Godinez, G. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. BAKER
Defendant:
RANDOLPH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Calvin Mitchell
Defendant:
S Baker and Richard Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl, Randy v. Pristen, J. et al
as 4:2013cv04078
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
J. Pristen, J. Smith, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv03266
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
Frederic S. Baker, Leilanie Lasola, Scott J. Drexel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl, Randy v. Pristen, J. et al
as 3:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
J. Pristen, J. Smith, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Kaiser et al
as 3:2013cv05010
Plaintiff:
Caleb S. Baker
Defendant:
Randee Kaiser, Murphy and Kingsberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tasby v. Wheatly
as 4:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Leon Tasby
Defendant:
NFN Wheatly, NFN Hendrix and S Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charley v. McDowell et al
as 6:2012cv01589
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charley
Defendant:
Pamela McDowell and S Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvatore Pellegrino v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 11-1480
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pellegrino
Interested Party - Appellant:
Salvatore Pellegrino
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Dr. Eugene Regier, Medical Director, SDSP/DOH Health Services, Doneen Hollingsworth, Secretary of Health, SD Department of Health and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
