Cases 1 - 10 of 16
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Tate et al
as 4:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Shaundrell Hubbard
Defendant:
K Tate, J Peyton, A Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shaw et al
as 1:2019cv07694
Defendant:
Clements, Sgt. Davenport, Sherwin Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Douglas, Brandon S. Lowery, D. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Woods et al
as 5:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Barry F Payton
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Greg Bolin, E Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Calloway v. Bond et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff:
Cortez Montrell Calloway
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Tonya Fisher, Cedrick Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
