Cases 51 - 60 of 323
Aldabe v. Cohen et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Defendant:
Benjamin J. Theisman, Noah Joshua Phillips, Amanda B. Kostner and others
Plaintiff:
Fermin Aldabe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45
WILSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv07001
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
EUGENE S. WILSON and GLORIA J. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry Wilson v. Dan Cromwell
as 21-1402
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY S. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
Wilson v. Rosfeld et al
as 1:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Phyllis H. Rosfeld and Howard B. Rosfeld
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lehan et al v. Wilson et al
as 8:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
Richard Lehan and Tamara Lehan
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Calvert County Board of County Commissioners, A&A Gaming, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RECO Equipment, Inc. v. Jeffrey Wilson, et al
as 20-4312
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY S. WILSON, REPUBLIC EQUIPMENT HOLDING LLC and JOSEPH CRAIG RUSSO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RECO EQUIPMENT, INC.
McGrady v. Thompson et al
as 3:2020cv01402
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Brown, Ofc. R. Weems, Lt. S. J. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher McGrady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maldonado v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
Alexander Maldonado, Jr.
Defendant:
WCSO, Diana Werkman and Hon. Judge S. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
