Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Lott et al v. Duffy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01580
Plaintiff: John Lott , Sheila Gantz and Bear Mountain Realty
Defendant: James S. Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ashraf v. Duffy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00908
Plaintiff: Zaman Ashraf
Defendant: Peter S. Duffy, Kent J. Mullen, Michael Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Bogovich et al v. Wishart et al
as 9:2012cv81179
Plaintiff: Ann R Bogovich and Glenn M Bogovich
Defendant: Robert J Wishart, Pamela S Duffy, Molly Whitlatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Duffy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv08294
Plaintiff: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant: Joseph S. Duffy, Hann Funeral Home, John or Jane #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Duffy, Sr., D.O. et al
as 4:2010cv00722
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Sean Duffy, Sr., D.O., Michael S. Duffy, Sr., D.O., P.C. and David Romaine Duffy
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Terrell v. Croft et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00578
Plaintiff: D-Nanekai Terrell
Defendant: Gary Croft, Terry Collins, Winks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40090
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Bankruptcy None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?