Cases 11 - 20 of 238
Akers v. Hill
as 3:2023cv01722
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Kathy S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. TDI/DWC - TWC et al
as 3:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Hill
Defendant:
TDI/DWC - TWC and CMS - SSA/HHSC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hill v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth S. Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robert F. Baker, Jr. v. James S. Hill
as 5:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James S. Hill, Daniel Cuevas, City of Corona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Stark County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Hill
Defendant:
Stark County Sheriff, Corrections SGT. Eaton, Corrections Officer Pries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Hill et al
as 6:2022cv01915
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Jamie Conover, Jason Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montgomery Akers v. Jamie Conover
as 22-2254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE CONOVER, GUY PAGLI, JODI WAMBLER and others
Charles Singletary v. James S. Hill
as 5:2022cv02130
Petitioner:
Charles Singletary
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hill
as 0:2022cv02927
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
