Cases 1 - 10 of 35
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
(PC) Gibson v. Moseley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kendale Gibson
Defendant:
Howard Moseley and S Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Ronell S. Rhodes
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Wertzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duff et al v. Rosenberg et al
as 1:2021cv06756
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Duff, Receiver for the Estate of EquityBuild, Inc., EquityBuild Finance LLC and others
Defendant:
Mark L Rosenberg and Law Offices of Mark L. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 1:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Glenn S. Rhodes
Defendant:
Superior Judge Daniel Craig, Adam Land, Barbara Claridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 21-35278
Defendant / Appellee:
A. EYNON, Grievance Coordinator, TRCI, MARK NOOTH, Eastside Institutions Administator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), HEEHN, Captain; Security Operations, TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Rhodes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03773
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Beverly S. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2018cv02096
Defendant:
Captain Heehn, R. Young, RN S. Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. County of Wayne Domestic Relations Section
as 2:2018cv11975
Plaintiff:
Jabari S. Rhodes
Defendant:
County of Wayne Domestic Relations Section
Meeks v. Nash et al
as 4:2018cv01723
Plaintiff:
James A. Meeks
Defendant:
Nash, Steve Massie, Mrs. Delord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
