Cases 1 - 10 of 1,053
Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ALDO DIBELARDINO
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General, PETER VINCENT CHIUSANO, MARK S. SMITH and others
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mandeep Rajhans v. Catherine Smith
as 24-10374
Plaintiff:
MANDEEP RAJHANS
Defendant:
CATHERINE S. SMITH
Hollamon v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA AARON HOLLAMON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHAEL R. MOORE, LAPD Police Chief, S. SMITH, Officer; Serial No. 33751 and others
Bradley v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Global Tel Link, T Cornett, GTL and others
Plaintiff:
Tyray A Bradley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rajhans v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Devlin Rajhans
Defendant:
Catherine S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Henry Gonzales
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division, Brian Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Coulean v. Smith
as 24-74
Petitioner / Appellant:
RIK O'COULEAN and Richard Collins
Respondent / Appellee:
S. SMITH
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
