Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Anderson et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv03473
Plaintiff:
Francesca Anderson, Sabretha Ervin Turner, Sabrina Morell and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Takada
as 5:2022mc80221
Plaintiff:
Saki Takada
Interested Party:
Twitter, Inc. and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xing Qi Store, wallet store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
KASAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02693
Plaintiff:
HELEN KASAY and HELEN A. KASAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JAMES WALKER, INEZ SAKI-TAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORMLY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GORMLY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INEZ SAKI-TAY, JAMES WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
