Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC v. DENNIS
as 1:2023cv22065
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC D/B/A ANNIEMAC HOME MORTGAGE and AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC doing business as ANNIEMAC HOME MORTGAGE
Defendant:
Dennis Scott Richard and RICHARD SCOTT DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dulany v. City of Pineville, MO et al
as 3:2023cv05035
Plaintiff:
JESSICA R DULANY
Defendant:
CITY OF PINEVILLE, MO, GREGG SWEETEN, JEFFREY SCOTT DENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dennis v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Dennis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WARES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14665
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DENNIS WARES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Denny v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2020cv00972
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Denny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Denny v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00972
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Denny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DENNY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68775
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DENNY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
