Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Martin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv22664
Plaintiff:
Bernadette M. Martin and Scott Martin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2013cv05178
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ TORRES
Defendant:
SCOTT MARTIN, PAUL K. SMEAL, JOSEPH P. SHIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as MOE/4:13-cv-01509
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
KD's Crossing, LTD v. Martin
as 4:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
KD's Crossing, LTD
Defendant:
Scott Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pride, Charles v. City of Eagle River, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Charles Pride
Defendant:
City of Eagle River, Wisconsin, Jeff Hyslop, Fred Intermuehle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pena et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09465
Plaintiff:
Veronica Pena and Justin Scott Martin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2012cv07116
Plaintiff:
HANS ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, OFFICE OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv07073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sales v. The City Of New York. et al
as 1:2012cv05936
Defendant:
Police Officer Scott Martin and The City Of New York.
Plaintiff:
Rupert Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
