Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Buck v. Goyim Defense League et al
as 3:2025cv00677
Plaintiff:
Deago Buck
Defendant:
Goyim Defense League, Jon Minadeo, II, Ryan Scott McCann and others
Counter-Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alan Bysheim, Jon Minadeo, II, Louie Dunn and others
Counter-Defendant:
Deago Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Acklin v. City of Conroe
as 23-20442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sylvie Anne Acklin
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Conroe, Texas, Chief Jeff Christy, Deputy Chief Jerry Abbott and others
Acklin v. City of Conroe, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv03713
Plaintiff:
Sylvie Anne Acklin
Defendant:
City of Conroe, Texas, Chief Jeff Christy, Dep Chief Jerry Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCANN et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
JILL MCCANN and SCOTT MCCANN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCann v. Young et al
as 5:2016cv04331
Plaintiff:
Scott McCann
Defendant:
Rabecca Young and Susan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dart v. Anthony, Kansas, City of, Board of City Commissioners et al
as 6:2012cv01261
Plaintiff:
Blakely Adam Dart
Defendant:
Anthony, Kansas, City of, Board of City Commissioners, Anthony, Kansas, City of, Daniel Levens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
