Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Winfred Simpson v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 24-6300
Petitioner:
WINFRED SCOTT SIMPSON
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
SIMPSON v. N.C. DEPT. OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
WINFRED SCOTT SIMPSON
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMPSON v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2022cv01194
Petitioner:
ALEX SCOTT SIMPSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI HOUTZDALE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown et al v. Simpson et al
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Derek Brown, L & J ASSET HOLDINGS, LLC and DLB CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
Dennis Scott Simpson, GENREIS, INC., GENREIS 1 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Simpson et al v. Peloton Interactive Inc et al
as 7:2021cv01721
Plaintiff:
Wayne Scott Simpson and Jordan Davis
Defendant:
Peloton Interactive Inc and XPO Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Winfred Simpson v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 21-7413
Petitioner / Appellant:
WINFRED SCOTT SIMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46804
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SIMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2020cv01110
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Petitioner:
WINFRED SCOTT SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio et al
as 1:2020cv02739
Defendant:
Lt. Michelle Prather, Unknown Correctional Officers 1-15, Sgt. Matthew Darone and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wiertella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
