Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Jackson v. Yellen et al
as 3:2024cv05033
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jackson
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Internal Revenue Service and Danny Werfel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Guillermo Montero
as 24-11117
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
GUILLERMO ANTONIO MONTERO
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
United States of America v. Detail Floor Services Corp
as 1:2024cv10973
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Detail Floor Services Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
United States of America v. $43,241.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$43,241.00 in United States Currency and Fifty-One United States Postal Service Money Orders Valued at $44,500.00
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Environmental Protection Info Center v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as 2:2023cv02611
Plaintiff:
Environmental Protection Information Center
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Industries
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22312
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC and APPROXIMATELY $1,642,755.55 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN F&M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ACCOUNT NOS. 5106230, 200025521, AND 1005278 HELD IN THE NAME OF KENT D. WARNING DBA PAYOFF ACCOUNT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Pancas Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Pancas Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
(NEEDS NEW COMPLAINT) Environmental Protection Info Center v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as 2:2023at01143
Plaintiff:
Environmental Protection Information Center
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 80020796, IN THE NAME OF DORAVILLE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, AT DEUTSCHE BANK INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED IN JERSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS OR ASSETS TR et al
as 1:2013cv01832
Claimant:
ZAINAB SHINKAFI BAGUDU, IBRAHIM BAGUDU, GODSON M. NNAKA and others
Defendant:
ALL ASSETS HELD IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 223406510PUSD, IN THE NAME OF STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AT BANQUE SBA, AND ALL INTEREST, BENEFITS, OR ASSETS TRACEABLE THERETO, STANDARD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION, TOGETHER WITH ITS ASSETS AND ALL PROPERTY TRACEABLE THERTO, ALL ASSETS HELD IN THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OF BLUE HOLDING (2) PTE. LTD., ON BEHALF OF OR TRACEABLE TO RIDLEY GROUP LIMITED, AND/OR THE RIDLEY TRUST AT J.O. HAMBRO INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND A and others
Interested Party:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA and NNSKS & ASSOCIATES
Petitioner:
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA and EMMANUEL OGEBE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. All Funds Held in Escrow by Clyde and Co. In The United Kingdom as Damages or Restitution in Petrosaudi v. PDVSA Uncitral Arbitration
as 2:2020cv08466
Defendant:
ALL FUNDS HELD IN ESCROW BY CLYDE & CO. IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AS DAMAGES OR RESTITUTION IN PETROSAUDI V. PDVSA UNCITRAL ARBITRATION and All Funds Held in Escrow by Clyde and Co. In The United Kingdom as Damages or Restitution in Petrosaudi v. PDVSA Uncitral Arbitration
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
PetroSaudi Oil Services (Venezuela) Ltd. and Clyde & Co LLP
Claimant:
Clyde and Co LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
