Cases 11 - 20 of 285
TALLEY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
Seth William Norton
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delilah El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, MICHAEL NUTTER, JIM KENNEY and others
Norton v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Seth William Norton
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Primecare Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Seth Williams
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Heavner v. Burns et al
as 5:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Brent Heavner and Brent Shaun Heavner
Defendant:
Seth W Burns, Thurman Whisnant, City of Hickory, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Seth Williams
as 21-1604
Defendant / Appellant:
SETH WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
