Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Smith v. Payson Concrete and Materials Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00429
Plaintiff:
Shaun Smith
Defendant:
Payson Concrete and Materials Incorporated, Tony McDaniel, Unknown McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Sharone Berry
as 15-361
Movant:
In re: SHARONE JERMAINE BERRY, a/k/a Shaun Smith, a/k/a Jerome Smith
:
Bell v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Shaun Smith, Peter William Bennett, Mark Anthony Ferrie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Shaun Smith v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv02208
Defendant:
Does, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, US Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Smith
Miller v. Villines et al
as 4:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller
Defendant:
Floyd Villines, Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Hoover et al
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Troy Mathew Floyd
Defendant:
Darin Hoover, Todd Gray, Lucas Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bar-Nadav et al v. Newport Holding Group, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv03551
Plaintiff:
Meiron Bar-Nadav , Jay Chakroborty , Shaun Smith and others
Defendant:
Newport Holding Group, L.L.C., Newport Exchange Holdings, Inc., OTA Franchise Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Shaun Smith
as 13-3053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAUN SMITH
U.S. Bank National Association v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv07981
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Shaun Smith, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as a Nominee for Equifirst Corporation and Charlene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
US v. Sharone Berry
as 12-7441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHARONE JERMAINE BERRY, a/k/a Shaun Smith, a/k/a Jerome Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
