Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dmitry Pronin v. J. Cannon, Jr.
as 21-6517
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD MATTHEW AUERBACH, SHERIFF J. AL CANNON, JR., M. MARSILLO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DMITRY PRONIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Post v. Comal County, Texas et al
as 5:2018cv00469
Defendant:
Gilbert Bragg, Comal County, Texas, McCreary, Veselka, Bragg and Allen, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Post
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Dingler v. City of Hutto, et al
as 18-50306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DINGLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HUTTO, DOUG GAUL, City Mayor, ODIS JONES, City Manager and others
Dingler v. City of Hutto et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant:
City of Hutto, Irasema Dima, Doug Gaul and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BUTLER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
SHAUNESSY BUTLER
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Glenda Austin et al v. Bayer Healthcare et al
as 2:2014cv08284
Plaintiff:
Rufaida Alfarouk, Rosa Arteaga, Glenda Austin and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Shaunessy v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv12285
Plaintiff:
Sue N. Shaunessy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Wilcox, et al
as 1:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wilson
Defendant:
Wilcox, Litvan, O'Shaunessy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grimes v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv01030
Petitioner:
Shaunessy Grimes
Respondent:
Marcus Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
