Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
SHELL CHEMICAL LP et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00641
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: SHELL CHEMICAL LP, EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY and others
Interested Party: SHELL OIL COMPANY and ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Shell Chemical LP, Shell Chemicals Canada (f/k/a Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.) by its managing partner Shell Canada Ltd., et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2020cv00525
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff: Shell Chemical LP, Shell Chemicals Canada (f/k/a Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.) by its managing partner Shell Canada Ltd.,, Shell Trading (US) Company, ., Pennzoil-Quaker State Company (formerly d/b/a SOPUS Products) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant: Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products US et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00396
Plaintiff: Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant: Shell Oil Products US, Shell Oil Company, Shell Petroleum, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
In re: North Sea Brent Crude O We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2233
Plaintiff: Michael Sevy, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,, Gregory H. Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Patricia Benvenuto, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Prime International Trading, Ltd., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, White Oaks Fund LP, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Kevin McDonnell, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: BP PLC, Trafigura Beheer B.V., Trafigura AG and others
Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA, John Doe 1 and others
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant: Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Marrero-Rolon, et al v. Autoridad de Energia Electrica, et al
as 16-8049
Plaintiff - Respondent: ISMAEL MARRERO-ROLON, ANNE CATESBY JONES, JORGE VALDES LLAUGER and others
Defendant: AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA ELECTRICA, a/k/a Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), WILLIAM RODNEY CLARK, EDWIN RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Petitioner: SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY
Marrero-Rolon, et al v. Shell Trading (US) Co., et al
as 16-8049
Respondent: ISMAEL MARRERO-ROLON, ANNE CATESBY JONES, JORGE VALDES LLAUGER and others
Defendant: ASOCIACION DE JUBILADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA ELECTRICA, a/k/a Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), WILLIAM RODNEY CLARK, EDWIN RODRIGUEZ and others
Petitioner: SHELL TRADING (US) COMPANY
State of Rhode Island v. Alon Refining Krotz Springs et al
as RI/1:16-CV-00495
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Defendant: Alon Refining Krotz Springs , Ashland, Inc. , Atlantic Richfield Company and others
State of Rhode Island v. Alon Refining Krotz Springs et al
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Defendant: Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?