Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Udell Rogers v. Dorrie Love, et al
as 24-1147
Plaintiff:
UDELL ROGERS
Defendant:
DORRIE LOVE, CHAD SCHULDT, STANLEY SIMONSON and others
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association et al v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2023cv03907
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association, Aaron Seitz, Allen Huju and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, The, Sarah Strommen, Erica Sawatzke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Simonson et al
as 3:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Defendant:
Lisa Simonson, All Persons Unidentified and/or Unknown and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Larry Johnson v. Thomas Brenneke, Jr., et al
as 23-35542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS BARRY BRENNEKE, Jr., GUARDIAN MANAGEMENT, GUARDIAN REAL ESTATE SERVICES and others
Gayle v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Tyrin Gayle
Defendant:
United States, S. Mowatt, Rhea Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Simonson v. Olejniczak et al
as 1:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Barbara Simonson
Defendant:
Thomas M Olejniczak, Steven J Krueger and Conway Olejniczak & Jerry SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Leticia Espinoza v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Leticia Espinoza
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Does 1 to 50 and W.I. Simonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chanel Inc v. Simonson
as 4:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Morita Simonson also known as Mori Simonson doing business as Too Chic & Cute and Mori Simonson
Plaintiff:
Chanel Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
