Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Matthew Kale v. Aero Simulation, Inc.
as 23-3380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Kale
Defendant / Appellee:
Aero Simulation, Inc.
Lucine Trim v. Simulate, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
LUCINE TRIM
Defendant:
SIMULATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kale v. Aero Simulation Inc.
as 5:2022cv05081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kale
Defendant:
Aero Simulation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DEHAAN et al v. TOP SHOT FIREARMS SIMULATOR, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEHAAN and JONATHAN SHERRILL
Defendant:
TOP SHOT FIREARMS SIMULATOR, INC. and MICHAEL WILSON
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL NELLINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
System Studies & Simulation v. US
as 21-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
CAE USA INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
L3 DOSS AVIATION, INC.
System Studies & Simulation v. US
as 21-1428
Defendant / Appellee:
CAE USA INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L3 DOSS AVIATION, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Red Wing Aeroplane Company v. Fidelity Flight Simulation, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Red Wing Aeroplane Company
Defendant:
Fidelity Flight Simulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. VI-grade GmbH et al
as 6:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Defendant:
VI-grade GmbH and System Level Simulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nave v. System Studies & Simulation Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Tina Nave
Defendant:
System Studies & Simulation Inc and Janice F Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
