Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Hennepin County, Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Prairie View Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Juan Anderson
Defendant:
Prairie View Police Department, Waller County Jail, Bennett Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Stanley et al v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sloan Patrick Stanley, Jacinta Stanley and Sloan Stanley
Defendant:
King County, City of Seattle, Rande Christiansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant:
Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
